Contact us

Make an appointment

our specialists

  01 40 79 40 36

secretariat

@chirurgiedusport.com

SOS KNEE

Sports Clinic

36 bd St Marcel

75005 PARIS

Sports clinic Paris

Metro: Saint Marcel

Parking 6 rue test


sur

'Pages chirurgiedusport :

HONCode

Ce site respecte les principes de la charte HONcode de HON Ce site respecte les principes de la charte HONcode.
Site certifié en partenariat avec la Haute Autorité de Sant├ę (HAS).
Check here

QRCode

Youtube video

Validity of GNRB arthrometer Compared To Telos in the assessment of partial anterior cruciate ligament tears

Print Article

Validity of GNRB arthrometer Compared To Telos in the assessment of partial anterior cruciate ligament tears

Abstract

The main goal of this study Was to compare the results of the GNRB ├ĺ arthrometer To Those of Telos TMin the diagnosis of partial thickness tears of the anterior cru- ciate ligament (ACL).

Methods A prospective study Performed January- December 2011 included all patients presenting with a partial or full-thickness tears ACL without ACL recon- struction and with a healthy contralateral knee. Anterior laxity Was Measured in all patients by the Telos TM and GNRB ├ĺ devices. This series included 139 patients, mean age 30.7 ┬▒9.3 years. Arthroscopic reconstruction Was Performed in 109 patients, 97 for full tears and 12 single bundle reconstructions for partial thickness tears. Conservative treatment Was Proposed in 30 patients with a partial thickness tear. The correlation entre les two devices Was Evaluated by the Spearman coefficient. The optimal laxity Thresholds Were Determined with ROC curves, and the diagnostic value of the tests Was Assessed by the area under the curve (AUC).

Results The differential laxities of full and partial thick- ness tears Were Significantly different with the two tests. The results of correlation entre les laxity measurement with the two devices was fair, with The Strongest correlation entre TelosTM 250 N and 250 N GNRB ├ĺ (r = 0.46, p = 0.00001). Evaluation of the AUC Showed que la informative value of all tests was fair with the best results with the GNRB ├ĺ250 N: AUC = 0.89 [95% CI 0.83-0.94]. The optimal differential laxity threshold with theGNRB ├ĺ Nwas2.5 250 mm (Se = 84%, Sp = 81%). Conclusion The diagnostic value of ├ĺ GNRBTelos was better than TM for partial thickness tears ACL.

Level of evidence Diagnostic study, Level II. Keywords Anterior cruciate ligament GNRB ├ĺ

Doctor Nicolas LEFEVRE, Doctor Yoann BOHU, Doctor Shahnaz KLOUCHE , Doctor Serge HERMAN. - 29 mars 2014.

Conflicts of interest: the author or authors have no conflicts of interest concerning the data published in this article.

News

Read also ...

Sensitivity and specificity of bell-hammer tear as indirect sign of an anterior cruciate ligament partial rupture on magnetic resonance imaging

Doctor Nicolas LEFEVRE, Doctor Yoann BOHU, Doctor Shahnaz KLOUCHE , Doctor Serge HERMAN.

The most read articles

Technical cruciate ligament

By Dr. Nicolas Lefevre

More videos

Last publications

Feature: knee prosthesis

total knee replacement

Feature: knee ligaments

Dossier: Ambulatory Surgery ACL

Dossier: meniscus

MENISCUS 3D CRACK MENISCUS TEAR SURGERY SPORTS

Feature: Shoulder sportsman

Folder: hip prosthesis

Dossier: break hamstring

Dr. Lefevre proximal anatomie_ischio_jambier_rupture chirurgiedusport

Dossier: prosthetic and sports

hip replacement and knee and sports

Dossier: PRP

Chirurgiedusport - Who are we - Contact us - Legal Notice - Web design Digitaline - EMC2 Studio development - Clinique du Sport